This reminds me of the gripe I had with my boy Pinkopanter having an ancient blemish on his IP (via PB most likely) that--fast-forward to the modern era--set him on the road toward eventual expulsion ...
Wasn't even the same title.
Well, there was the matter of his going apeshit and reverse fly casting his boneless brown trout around the forums ...
@lostsantana - in other words, stay the course--you've got a community that embraces you. There should be a road back, one that may involve some face-saving measures. (New account? A digital mustache? So be it--a longstanding, spotless record among the community should be worth something when it comes to "sentencing" in these situations ... context and documentary evidence--there is capturable code FFS so why don't they share it?--matters)
But to me this mostly underscores the insanity of a single agency given somewhat omnipotent capability to ban, with limited financial incentive to adjudicate fairly or at least have a 2-strike/3-strike warning ... I dunno.
There but for the grace of PB go I?
I dont think Pinko and Santana are in the same category but I do agree about PBBans and their methods. There is no oversight.